Comparison:  Multiple-Employer vs.
Individual-Employer OPEB Trusts

Multiple-Employer Structure

The multiple-employer structure provides economies of scale with investment, administrative, legal, compliance and cost efficiencies. There are only a few collective, IRS-approved OPEB trusts available. Such trusts have some of the advantages of a CalPERS or CalSTRS pension system, as participating agencies benefit from accumulating assets together for investment and administrative purposes. Investment and other costs decrease with asset accumulation. In addition, with a multiple-employer trust that has received an IRS Private Letter Ruling on a multiple-employer basis, there is no need for each entity joining the trust to undergo this long and costly process.  Each individual agency that joins the trust is covered by the PLR as soon as the documents are signed and the trust is implemented.  Finally, another advantage of the multiple-employer structure is the ease and speed with which and entity can join the trust and begin funding.  Because the trust is already designed, already has a covering PLR, and provides signature ready trust documents, the implementation process is streamlined and an entity can quickly approve and join the trust.

Individual-Employer Structure

To set up an individual trust an entity could hire its own attorney, design its own trust, obtain its own PLR, and administer its own trust. This approach, however, may prove to be staff intensive and costs can be higher than with using a multiple-employer structure since providers would expect lower asset accumulations.  An individual trust program is better suited for entities that seek maximum flexibility and are willing to incur legal costs if necessary for formal IRS approval of the trust’s tax qualified status. This approach may work better for larger public agencies with higher asset amounts that do not need the economies of scale associated with a multiple-employer structure and can absorb the additional legal and IRS costs if needed and are not in a hurry to begin funding. An individual trust allows for more flexibility in that trust documents can be changed by the without concurrence of other agencies (though this is rarely an issue with multiple-employer trusts). Any changes still must be reviewed by the trustee and in compliance with state and federal law. An individual trust allows for individualized reporting and administration as well. 

_______________________

The following is a table that illustrates some of the differences between the two trust types:

Feature

Multiple Employer Trust

Individual Trust

IRS Approvals Needed by Agency

No – IRS has approved for all participating agencies in multiple employer trust

Yes – City must apply and incur legal cost  and time for IRS approval

Trust Set-up

Multiple-Employer Trust already established – no need to set up an individual trust.

Individual trust – must be established by agency

Governing Board Approval

Approves adopting existing trust, i.e. joins trust

Approves creating its own trust for the agency

Trust Implementation Timeframe

Implementing and contributing assets into trust can be done more quickly typically because trust already established and in operation; IRS approvals already in place.

Implementation and contribution of assets can be slower since new trust has to be established and made operational.  Tax qualified status not protected by IRS until IRS approvals, which can take up to a year.

Trust Documents

Master plan and trust documents, with customization typically in an adoption agreement and plan document

Documents can be individualized to agency, without state and federal legal restrictions.

Investment Pooling

Investments can be pooled or managed as separate investment accounts for individual agencies

No investment pooling

Document Amendments

Requires a vote of 2/3rd of participating employers to change trust; plan and adoption agreement are for individual agencies and can be changed. Amendments cannot be in violation of state and federal law and could invalidate IRS ruling.

Can amend documents. Amendments cannot be in violation of state and federal law and could invalidate IRS ruling.

Investment Costs

Investment costs can decrease over time with accumulation of assets at higher rate since multiple employers involved.

Investment costs can decrease over time if sufficiently large amount of assets invested by the one agency that created the trust – typically this has to be larger agency with larger OPEB liability/ARC.

Legal/Administrative Costs

Legal and administrative costs tend to be lower because of economies of scale of multiple employer approach.

Legal and administrative costs tend to be higher because of individual legal costs.

Auditing

Audit can be done on entire trust for efficiency purposes.

Individual audit needed.

 

Contact a PARS consultant today at:

(800) 540-6369

The information and analysis provided in this publication is
based upon PARS' understanding of the facts.
Before taking any action based on this information and analysis,
the agency should consult with its professional advisors.


Updated: April 16, 2010